Garrett Johns vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who has the slight edge in second serve performance? Kang, with 44.39% points won compared to Johns' 43.8% in recent months.
• Can return game stats determine a favorite? While Kang excels in first serve returns with a 33.22% success rate, Johns outperforms in second serve returns, winning 45.34% of points.
• How do the players handle pressure? Johns has been more successful under pressure, saving 52% of breakpoints, compared to Kang's 43.75%.
• Which player has a better match win rate recently? Kang boasts a 68.75% win rate over the past year, slightly better than Johns’ 65.52%.
• On which surface do each player's strengths lie? Kang is stronger on Clay (62% win rate), whereas Johns excels on Hard courts with a 66% win rate.
• At which event level do players perform differently? Johns has a marginal advantage in $10K Futures/ITF tournaments, winning 73.33% of matches, compared to Kang’s 71.43%.
• Who has faced tougher opponents recently? Johns, who has competed against players with an average rank of 417.43, compared to Kang's opponents averaging a rank of 440.75.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, who might come out on top? Johns has won 70% of deciding sets, slightly outperforming Kang's 64% success rate.
• Who is more efficient in converting break points? Kang is more effective with a conversion rate of 52.94%, significantly higher than Johns’ 30.05%.

Editorial Prediction (June 27, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the available data, several insights emerge regarding the potential outcome of this matchup. Kang showcases a slight advantage in second serve performance and is more effective at converting break points.

On the other hand, Johns excels in saving breakpoints and has faced tougher opponents, indicating a better ability to thrive under pressure. Additionally, Johns has the upper hand in both second serve returns and deciding set performances.

Considering these factors, while both players have their strengths, Johns’ ability to handle pressure and overall competitive experience suggest that they are more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.